The Federal Council as a political institution has never been scrutinized more closely until now. “In part because it’s extremely difficult to get information on precisely what’s happening in the Federal Council chamber,” explains Adrian Vatter, Professor of Political Science. Sitting federal councillors are unwilling to provide any details at all and even former federal councillors have to have a great deal of trust in somebody before they would ever disclose anything that happened in the Federal Council chamber. “That also has something to do with paradigms in social science,” says Vatter. It was characterized by the history of “great men” until the middle of the 20th century but starting in the 1960s, the focus shifted toward social structures and the behavior of the general population. There’s been a bit of a revival in the past five to ten years, however, and the spotlight is shifting back to the political elite. “There’s been a realization that the decisions of individuals – such as those made by individual federal councillors – are indeed quite relevant,” explains the political scientist.
Institutions facing challenges
“The polarization of the multi-party system as well as the way politics are portrayed in media coverage and the personalization of politics demand a great deal from the political system and its representatives – not to mention the pandemic, which has led to an extreme shift in responsibilities and power structures,” explains Vatter. According to him, Switzerland is characterized by a strong division of power like no other country. “Of the three institutions – the Council of States, the National Council and the Federal Council – it’s the Federal Council that holds the most power.” After all: “The Federal Council is involved in every phase of a political transaction – from the initiation of draft bills to the drafting of ordinances – which makes it extremely influential,” says Vatter. Plus, the fact that federal councillors can appoint people to key positions in the department and in federal agencies also lends them a great deal of influence. The Council of States is quite clearly the stronger and more influential of the two chambers since it is the first to discuss more matters and takes a more united stance on them. “It’s a bit of a paradox that the chamber that gets the most attention in the media – the National Council – is actually the one with the least amount of influence,” he points out.